<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News! Castro and the hemisphere agree!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cuba.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2009/07/03/news-castro-and-the-hemisphere-agree/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cuba.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2009/07/03/news-castro-and-the-hemisphere-agree/</link>
	<description>Continuity and change in Havana, Miami and Washington</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cuba-Honduras-United States &#187; Cuba</title>
		<link>http://cuba.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2009/07/03/news-castro-and-the-hemisphere-agree/comment-page-1/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Cuba-Honduras-United States &#187; Cuba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 01:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cuba.foreignpolicyblogs.com/?p=961#comment-152</guid>
		<description>[...] As we previously predicted, it was unlikely that Cuba and the United States would find themselves on the same side of this issue for long. Both opposed the ouster, but now Cuba is in direct opposition to the U.S. role in the still-unfolding events. From the peanut gallery, it seems like an unfortunate lose-lose(-lose) situation for the United States: get more involved on Zelaya&#8217;s side and endure criticism for typical U.S. interventionism; get more involved on the opposite side and come under fire for supporting what was for all intents and purposes a military overthrow; try stepping out altogether and get told by hemispheric leaders like Chavez, Morales, and Castro to take a hard and serious stand (or else). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As we previously predicted, it was unlikely that Cuba and the United States would find themselves on the same side of this issue for long. Both opposed the ouster, but now Cuba is in direct opposition to the U.S. role in the still-unfolding events. From the peanut gallery, it seems like an unfortunate lose-lose(-lose) situation for the United States: get more involved on Zelaya&#8217;s side and endure criticism for typical U.S. interventionism; get more involved on the opposite side and come under fire for supporting what was for all intents and purposes a military overthrow; try stepping out altogether and get told by hemispheric leaders like Chavez, Morales, and Castro to take a hard and serious stand (or else). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News! Castro and the hemisphere agree! » Cuba &#124; Cuba today</title>
		<link>http://cuba.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2009/07/03/news-castro-and-the-hemisphere-agree/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>News! Castro and the hemisphere agree! » Cuba &#124; Cuba today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 21:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cuba.foreignpolicyblogs.com/?p=961#comment-119</guid>
		<description>[...] View original here: News! Castro and the hemisphere agree! » Cuba [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] View original here: News! Castro and the hemisphere agree! » Cuba [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
